The Interagency Committee on Disability Research (ICDR) issued a reminder about its process for securing recommendations about priorities for about disability and rehabilitation research. Following its earlier call for recommendations, ICDR now solicits public voting about the agenda.
The ICDR Seeks Your Recommendations on Emerging Disability Research Topics
Web site provides opportunity to vote and prioritize disability issues of greatest concern
This year for the first time, the federally mandated Interagency Committee on Disability Research (ICDR) is utilizing an innovative Web-based approach to collect online disability research comments to assist in developing a federal disability and rehabilitation 2010 research agenda. This technology-driven approach gives the public a three-week timeframe from March 27th through April 17th to submit their recommendations. Additionally, registered participants will be invited to review all comments submitted and vote on their top 10 concerns in each topic area during the one-week period from April 22nd through April 29th. Public comments from stakeholders are the focal point of the disability research recommendations in the ICDR Annual Report to the President and Congress.
All disability-related research topics are welcomed, including discussion about concerns important to the veteran and military communities. The ICDR is seeking comments with special emphasis placed in the following areas:
Collaboration and coordination among federal agencies; Health information technology and/or electronic health records; Health disparities; Health promotion in the workplace; Employment and health; and Other critical research issues. Guidelines and Instructions:
Access the ICDR Public Comment Web site: http://www.icdr.us/stakeholders for complete instructions, guidelines, and registration. If you do not have access to a computer or the Internet, you may mail your comments to ICDR c/o CESSI, 6858 Old Dominion Drive, Suite 250, McLean, VA 22101 or fax to 703-442-9015. Please follow the following instructions for written comments:
- No longer than 250 words or 1500 characters
- Single-spaced using 12-point font in Times New Roman
Key Dates:
Web-based Public Comments: March 27 – April 17, 2009 (3:00 P.M. EDT) Written Comments: March 27 – April 17, 2009 (Must be postmarked no later than the deadline) Online Public Voting: April 22 – 29, 2009 (11:59 P.M. EDT)
Cross-posted with EBD Blog.
Sphere: Related Content
Kirk used “Learning Disability” before 1963
I was fiddling around with a new feature of Google and thought I’d test its use on a task. Having just read the only entry in the proposed canon for LD (please add to it, folks), I thought I’d search for instances of the perpetuation of the myth that S. A. Kirk coined the term Learning Disability in 1963 in a speech to the group that would become the Association for Children with Learning Disabilities (and, ultimately, the the Learning Disabilities Association of America, and of many other countries, too).
“But, everybody says that’s when he coined it, don’t they?” Not really. Some folks know that Professor Kirk and Barbara Bateman had already used the term “Learning Disabilities” in a paper published a half year earlier (and, given the delay between submission and publication of an article, they’d likely used the term at least a year before the famous meeting).
This analysis does not take anything away from the importance of the meeting in Chicago; that was a signal event, an illustration of the political clout of parents who rally around a common theme in the service of their children. That meeting was the beginning of what one might call the Learning Disabilities movement in the US and now the world. In fact, the LDA site doesn’t make the mistake about the birth of the term; it simply recounts the momentuous events that occured there and then.
Professor Bateman explained it correctly (and she should know) in her 2005 paper “The Play’s the Thing”: “The definition of LD, now controversial, was not an issue when the term learning disabilities was first introduced by Kirk in 1962.”
Anyway, I started a list of places where writers have perpetuated the myth that the term “Learning Disabilities” was introduced in 1963 at the Chicago meeting. Here are a few.
New York Times obituary for Professor Kirk.
Psychpage
2005 Newsletter of the Oregon chapter of Learning Disabilities Assocation of America.
Doris Johnson’s abstract for a plenary session at the University of Pennsylvania.
S. W. Lee in The Encyclopedia of School Psychology (p. 290).
But, I really ought to give credit to those who got it right, who didn’t repeat the misinformation. Ahhh, but that’s another entry.
Bateman, B. (2005). The play’s the thing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 93-99.
Sphere: Related Content