LD Blog Info
LD Blog provides news and information about Learning Disabilities. It is privately funded and the views presented in the posts and the comments are solely the opinions of their authors. The primary contributor to LD Blog is John Wills Lloyd, Ph.D. shortage
Blogroll
- ADHD Guide
- B. Mod.
- Barto's World
- Dairy of an NNT
- EBD Blog
- HTMCCR
- Language Fix
- LD Advocates
- Letters from Lisa
- Liz Ditz’s LD posts
- Mizz Givens’ Blog
- On Special Ed
- Sound it Out
- Sp. Ed.: The Rise and Fall
- Special Ed Law Blog (Gerl)
- Special Ed Today
- Special Education Law (Fox)
- spedpro
- Teach Effectively!
- Teacherscreech
LD Links
Thanks for the conversation
Spam Bloackage
Tags on posts
ADD
ADHD
adults
advocacy
blogs
bologna
brain
Causes
college
Dyscalculia
Dyslexia
early literacy
Families
funding
genetics
glasses
identification
instruction
interventions
law
legal aspect
lenses
Literacy
misunderstanding
News
NPR
Obituaries
optometry
Organizations
other sources
parents
Policy
polls
press
public policy
reading
reading problems
Research
RTI
teacher education
teacher training
teaching
therapy
Treatment
vision
Categories
- ADHD (49)
- Administration (51)
- Administrivia (20)
- Assessment (30)
- Bookshelf (8)
- Causes (25)
- Comments (143)
- Dyscalculia (11)
- Dysgraphia (5)
- Dyslexia (150)
- Elementary (3)
- Events (16)
- Families (107)
- Foundation (7)
- History (8)
- Literacy (13)
- News (438)
- Not LD (38)
- Policy (67)
- Preschool (3)
- Primary (2)
- Professional development (14)
- Research (122)
- Secondary (2)
- Social relations (5)
- The press (190)
- Theory (3)
- Treatment (41)
- Uncategorized (8)
Is LD viable?
L-to-R: T. Scruggs (foreground), D. Fuchs, M. Gerber,
and N. Zigmond
At the behest of Rollanda O’Connor, Dan Hallahan gathered four informed people—Naomi Zigmond, Tom Scruggs, Mike Gerber, and Doug Fuchs—to address this question: “The LD Construct: Can it be Saved? Is it Worth Saving?” The discussion, which was held at the annual international convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, as a product of the Division for Learning Disabilities (DLD). Of course, I’m biased (I am compensated as the executive director for DLD), but I have to say that this was a top-notch event.
These advocates agreed that there really is something to LD. They argued clearly and effectively that educators need to reconsider the construct of LD; focus on individual students needs; the needs of those students can (in fact) be discriminated from others who have low achievement; that there’s lots of good to response to instruction (or intervention), but it’s neither likely to address all the learning problems students experience nor identify those who need additional services; and that those students may need instruction that is radically different from what they can get in general education settings.
There’s lots more to what they had to say, and I hope TeachingLD can capture and disseminate it. If so, I’ll relate it here.
Sphere: Related Content