Latest Comments
- Liz Ditz on the post Local parent groups
- Liz Ditz on the post Local parent groups
- John on the post NLP bunk
- Timaru Herald Newspaper Covers on the post Another splendid feat
- Philip Boudreau,PhD on the post Helmer Myklebust
- Ghotit on the post FCRR dyslexia document
- Ghotit on the post An illiterate teacher
- JohnL on the post Differential drug effects in arithmetic
- Jacki on the post Differential drug effects in arithmetic
- Michael Mckeehan on the post Dyslexic entrepreneurs
Brain Gym (Skeptic’s Dictionary)
Wheeeheee! Over on the Skeptic’s Dictionary, Robert T. Carroll has a take-down and pin of Brain Gym. The contemporary incarnation of some ideas that were thoroughly discredited in Learning Disabilities in the 1970s, Brain Gym is making something of a splash. Shoot, it even appeared in one of my Curry School colleague’s classes for a while, as I understand.
Professor Carroll’s indictment of Brain Gym presents a good opportunity to make an important point. The problem with Brain Gym and many of its siblings is not that the activities might not be worthwhile, it’s that the advocates over-reach so substantially. Shoot, I’m glad to advocate that we teach kids who might fit the clumsy category how to walk, move, dance, play basketball, and etc. I just don’t want people to be sold a bill of goods about how doing so will improve those children’s reading, etc.
Read Professor Carroll’s analysis. Need info on the research about the benefits of perceptual-motor training? Here’s a link to a meta-analysis.