Over on I Speak of Dreams, Liz Ditz has several recent posts readers might enjoy…or at least find educational.
Search
Calendar
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Dec | Feb » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Category List
- ADHD (24)
- Administration (20)
- Administrivia (13)
- Assessment (15)
- Bookshelf (5)
- Causes (6)
- Comments (98)
- Dyscalculia (6)
- Dyslexia (95)
- Families (49)
- News (310)
- Not LD (30)
- Policy (35)
- Research (56)
- The Press (79)
- Treatment (1)
Tag Cloud
- ADHD
- Assessment
- bologna
- brain
- construct
- definition
- DLD
- Dyscalculia
- Dyslexia
- early literacy
- education
- entertainment
- Families
- fluency
- funding
- government officials
- instruction
- LD
- learning
- learning disability
- misrepresentation
- misunderstanding
- movies
- NJCLD
- NPR
- Organizations
- other sources
- parents
- Policy
- polls
- press
- press mistakes
- publicity
- reading
- reading problems
- Research
- reversals
- RTI
- skepticism
- teacher education
- teacher training
- teaching
- Treatment
Links
Blogroll
LD Links
Organizations
Pointers
Latest Comments
- Liz Ditz on the post Local parent groups
- Liz Ditz on the post Local parent groups
- John on the post NLP bunk
- Timaru Herald Newspaper Covers on the post Another splendid feat
- Philip Boudreau,PhD on the post Helmer Myklebust
- Ghotit on the post FCRR dyslexia document
- Ghotit on the post An illiterate teacher
- JohnL on the post Differential drug effects in arithmetic
- Jacki on the post Differential drug effects in arithmetic
- Michael Mckeehan on the post Dyslexic entrepreneurs
Thanks for the link–sitting around waiting for a kid is much more productive now that there’s ubiquitous wireless. Thank [$deity] she gets her driver’s license back tomorrow. It’s been a long month.
John, I have a question: why does Zig think dyslexia is a myth, or in KdeRosa’s words, “a junk diagnosis”?
It makes me a little irritable…but of course it is my ox, or more properly, my daughter’s ox, that is gored.
I don’t disagree with Engelmann’s fundamental premise (correct instruction, given at sufficient intensity, would dramatically improve reading across the board).
I think of a certain young lady. She applied for admission to a school for gifted and talented students when she was four years, one month old, which required an IQ test for admission. This was before she had had any formal tuition in reading. The scatter in the subtest scores was remarkable (and I sure wish I’d known then what I know now!).
This young lady benefitted from extensive remediation beginning in second grade with a scientifically-grounded program. But deficits in language processing remain.
Examples: difficulty with accurate rendition of polysyllabic recall: after only having read “proprioception” pronounce it as prioproception. On looking at a poinsettia, calls it “that parenthesis plant”. This young lady, in handwritten work is just as likely to produce deitary for dietary or nulcleus for nucleus. Yes, she can recognize the error afterword, and she recognizes that they are two different kinds of errors. (Interestingly, she is much less likely to make those kinds of errors while keyboarding–the automaticity of the keyboarding is perhaps better than the automaticity of handwriting.)
So this young lady’s issues are because she didn’t have Direct Instruction beginning in kindergarten?