I found one! I found a false positive identification of Learning Disabilities!
Well, O.K., it’s not really one. It’s just that a student was mistakenly assigned to special education services because the school misspelled his name.
Read Sarah Carr’s story from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinal.
Sphere: Related Content
Over on I Speak of Dreams, Liz has been busy the last couple of days. She’s got a whole flock of good posts:
Sphere: Related Content
Response and Recognition, an early intervening project conducted by the Frank Porter Graham Center and funded by the Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation, has released a document describing its recommendations for preventing Learning Disabilities.
SOME YOUNG CHILDREN show signs that they may not be learning in an expected manner, even before they begin kindergarten. These children may exhibit problems in areas such as language development, phonological awareness, perceptual-motor abilities, and attention, which have been considered precursors of learning disabilities in older children. However, under current state and federal guidelines, these children are nlikely to meet eligibility criteria for having a learning disability.
Download the report or jump to the Web site.
Sphere: Related Content
Liz Ditz has a note about a new book entitled IDEA 2004: Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act: A Parent Handbook for School Age Children with Learning Disabilities by Shelley Smith, who is a school psychologist and parent advocate. Read Liz’s post to learn more.
Sphere: Related Content
Among the annual burst of human interest stories about the triumphs of students with Learning Disabilities, I found one about Zane Vogel, a young man who a graduated early from high school at least a year ago and is now “taking a break” from college. The story, by Lynn Taylor Rick in the Rapid City Journal (SD, US), is chockful of connections for LD Blog. Because there many of them, I’ll forego embedding an extended quote and list a few here.
- Mr. Vogel “didn’t realize that the way he reversed letters or the way he equated words with pictures was typical of a dyslexic.”—Ooopsie! Too bad that someone passed the reversals myth along to Mr. Vogel and too bad that Ms. Rick perpetuated it here.
- Mr. Vogel’s mother “suspected dyslexia. But when she asked her son’s various teachers, they dismissed the idea.”—I continue to be distressed by the way educators too often dismiss Learning Disabilities; I cannot, of course, say what actually happened between Mr. Vogel’s mother and teachers, but I’ve heard lots of stories like this. We educators have to understand that students with these problems do not simply outgrow them, parents’ concerns are worthy of careful consideration, and inaction is mistake.
- “Finally having a name for his struggles and some help meant Vogel began seeing a future for himself. ‘To see accomplished people with it (dyslexia) got me excited about school again,’ he said”—Labeling isn’t so terrible, and here is the good side of celebrity LD, a topic we’ve covered off and on here.
- “Although Vogel has come out on top in his struggle with a learning disability, he still deals with it daily.”—Learning Disabilities do not go away when formal schooling ends.
Link to Ms. Rick’s article. Take a couple of minutes to read it.
Sphere: Related Content
Perpetuating lazy myth
I hesitate to report on this, as I’ve previously pointed out the concerns I have about the recommendations from the special education correspondent for about.com here and here, but I can’t restrain myself.
Two problems: (a) Although complete teaching requires us to incorporate motivational aspects in lessons, simply convincing students of their confidence isn’t likely to produce benefits; these kids’ problems are not because they’re unmotivated or lazy. (b) If one follows the link embedded in the tease for the entry, one finds vapid recommendations.
I’m struggling here. What question should I ask? There must be something missing, but I can understand as I know no writer can claim to have made no syntactic mistakes. It must be that the reader is to ask whether each activity promotes worthwhile learning.
Anyway, I’d guess that, from Ms. Watson’s perspective, the first five are bad and the last three are good.
Sphere: Related Content