Comments on: De-emphasize fancy tests http://LDBlog.com/2005/10/31/de-emphasize-fancy-tests/ News, commentary, and resources about Learning Disabilities Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:50:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: JohnL http://LDBlog.com/2005/10/31/de-emphasize-fancy-tests/#comment-4217 JohnL Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:21:55 +0000 http://johnl.edschool.virginia.edu/blogs/LDBlog/2005/10/31/de-emphasize-fancy-tests/#comment-4217 Greg, thanks for taking the time to drop a comment after reading this <i>LD Blog</i> entry. You identified a typo that I regret. I've edited it. Greg, thanks for taking the time to drop a comment after reading this LD Blog entry. You identified a typo that I regret. I’ve edited it.

]]> By: Greg J. http://LDBlog.com/2005/10/31/de-emphasize-fancy-tests/#comment-4204 Greg J. Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:22:21 +0000 http://johnl.edschool.virginia.edu/blogs/LDBlog/2005/10/31/de-emphasize-fancy-tests/#comment-4204 "Psychologists should not be able to use them as mumble-jumble that establishes underserved superior knowledge." I'm curious about this statement. When you say "underserved superior knowledge" do you mean "undeserved"? If not what doe you mean by "underserved"? “Psychologists should not be able to use them as mumble-jumble that establishes underserved superior knowledge.”

I’m curious about this statement. When you say “underserved superior knowledge” do you mean “undeserved”? If not what doe you mean by “underserved”?

]]>