Monthly Archive for September, 2005

Perceptual deficits in dyslexia

Anne Sperling and colleagues reported that children with dyslexia differ from their non-dyslexic peers when performing

We evaluated signal-noise discrimination in children with and without dyslexia, using magnocellular and parvocellular visual stimuli presented either with or without high noise. Dyslexic children had elevated contrast thresholds when stimuli of either type were presented in high noise, but performed as well as non-dyslexic children when either type was displayed without noise. Our findings suggest that deficits in noise exclusion, not magnocellular processing, contribute to the etiology of dyslexia.

Please don’t think that this story contridicts other stories about problems experienced by individuals with LD. Perceptual deficits as described here are not about reversals.

Link.

Sphere: Related Content

More misrepresentation

While I’m on the subject, there is a story from the Washington Post (DC, US) that shows typical confusion about Learning Disabilities. Dedicated readers of LDBlog know that I have repeatedly noted how people misuse “Learning Disability” as a generic term for disability, etc. Post staff writer Avis Thomas-Lester opened a story with this lead:

Holy Trinity Episcopal Day School in Bowie is welcoming a new head administrator, and First Baptist School of Laurel is constructing a new building and expanding a program to work with mildly and moderately learning-disabled students.

The use of the adjective phrase “mildly and moderately” caught my attention. I read the remainder of the article. However, I did not learn much about what the schools were doing. In fact, I grew confused when the story revealed that one school was predicating it’s program on the National Institute of Learning Disabilities. Here is an extended quote.

Cathey said the biggest change academically this year will be the addition of a program called Spectrum “to provide additional support for students with unique learning styles.” The program is part of the National Institute of Learning Disabilities, although it is not for learning-disabled children.

“Holy Trinity is a school for average and above-average children, but any children may experience difficulty with an aspect of writing or comprehension,” she said. “Spectrum allows students to recognize and identify strategies to strengthen their weaknesses.”

Haube said First Baptist School for the past few years has been honing a program geared toward learning-disabled students — a non-traditional population among parochial and private school students.

The school has hired an assistant administrator to oversee the program, which offers both modifications and accommodations for learning disabled students, she said.

“That’s not usual for private schools,” she said. “But we feel that God is leading us to that. We can’t say to parents that because their child has special needs, they can’t have a Christian education.”

The National Institute of Learning Disabilities is a private consulting organization based on a limited amount of research of modest strength. Hmmmmmm…. I’m sorry that those educators, parents, and students (both those with and without LD) are unlikely to get access to the teaching procedures that research has shown to be the most effective.

Link to the Post story.

Sphere: Related Content

Reversals campaign

As documented in earlier posts here, here, here and here, I’ve been campaigning to correct the misunderstanding about the relationship between reversals and Learning Disabilities. I’ve put a comment on the TeachingLD.org site asking for suggestions about how professionals in LD can help others to understand the non-relationship. You’re welcome to leave comments there and here.

Sphere: Related Content

Is dyslexia just a construct?

The Learning Disabilities world in Great Britain appears to be in a flap over an editorial by Julian Elliott, professor of education at Durham University, who questioned whether dyslexia is real or just a construct. Elliott’s argument appears to be similar to those familiar to people following the question of whether a discrepancy between ability and achievemenet defines Learning Disability. Do individuals who have a discrepancy between IQ and achievement require different educational efforts than their peers who have similarly low reading performance but no discrepancy? However, I’m still trying to get a copy of the original editorial so that I can report it accurately. Meanwhile, there’s lots of coverage in other sources.

News reports about the article include these:

  • Times Ed Supplement coverage of its own story here and here.
  • Link to the BBC’s coverage.
  • Link for theGuardian Unlimited(UK)
  • Link to discussion on the Times Ed. Supplement site.
  • Link to news release from Professor Elliott’s university, that includes a link to a profile of him.

Update: Liz Ditz has a post about this story, too.

Update 2: Link to another page of the Guardian Unlimited’s coverage (thanks, to Stacy Weiss’ Special Education News and Links).

Sphere: Related Content

Mayo Clinic perpetuates myths

In a series of pages that provide clearly written information about dyslexia for parents, the Mayo Clinic perpetuates at least three myths about that Learning Disability. The pages report that reversals are a symptom of dyslexia, that an underlying brain malfunction is immutable, and that multi-sensory instruction is required. Let’s take them one at at time.

Reversals of letters (b for d) and a reversal of words (saw for was) are typical among children who have dyslexia. Reversals are common for children age 6 and younger who don’t have dyslexia. But with dyslexia, the reversals persist.

This is a topic that we’ve long ago and only recently addressed, and almost certainly one we shall have to address again. Here’s the problem: Reversals are not an indicator of reading problems. They are a red herring. It is true that children with reading problems make numerically more reversal errors than do their normal reading counterparts, but they do not make proportionally more reversal errors.

2. Now for the brain malfunction argument:

There’s no known way to correct the underlying brain malfunction that causes dyslexia. Treatment is by remedial education.

Although imaging research shows that, when performing reading tasks, the areas of activation in the brains of individuals with reading disabilities are different from the areas of activation in the brains of individuals who read normally, contemporary studies show that effective remedial reading instruction causes the areas of activation in the brains of individuals with reading disabilities to change. After successful remediation, scans show activity in the same areas of the brain for both those who had reading problems and those who read normally. The “underlying brain malfunction” is changed by effective instruction.

3. Now, for the remediation misconception:

Teachers may use techniques involving hearing, vision and touch to improve reading skills. Helping a child use several senses to learn ? for example, by listening to a taped lesson and tracing with a finger the shape of the words spoken ? can help him or her process the information. The most important teaching approach may be frequent instruction by a reading specialist who uses these multisensory methods of teaching.

This is the ever-popular multi-sensory myth. How can one teach reading in a uni-sensory way? Research has revealed very clearly how to teach decoding effectively. Instruction based on that research is what we need to tout for these kids. At least the writer used the weasel word “may.”

It’s terribly disappointing to see a prestigious organization misrepresenting Learning Disabilities. Now we need to see whether the developers of this site will correct the errors. Please write to them. They use a Web form for correspondence and it’s linked here.

Link to the first of the series of Web pages about dyslexia. Link to our recent post about reversals, to an earlier post about reversals, and to a page explaining more about that myth.

Sphere: Related Content

Success story

Mike Carter is an example of individuals with Learning Disabilities who succeed, according to a story by Deborah Cearnal of the Clay County Line (carried by Jacksonville.com, Jacksonville, FL, US). Ms. Cernal’s story recounts both the LD aspects of Mr. Carter’s experience and his multiple business adventures.

Link to Ms. Cearnal’s story.

Sphere: Related Content