<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bummer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ldblog.com/2005/07/04/bummer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://LDBlog.com/2005/07/04/bummer/</link>
	<description>News, commentary, and resources about Learning Disabilities</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Teach Effectively! &#187; The usual edujunk</title>
		<link>http://LDBlog.com/2005/07/04/bummer/#comment-3930</link>
		<dc:creator>Teach Effectively! &#187; The usual edujunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnl.edschool.virginia.edu/blogs/LDBlog/?p=60#comment-3930</guid>
		<description>[...] There are lots of reasons to reject Ms. Nagle&#8217;s analysis. This snippet shows only one: Learning Disability is not the result of a lack of motivation. If children with Learning Disabilities were not motivated, then all we would need would be some powerful reinforcers, as we have argued in earlier posts on TeachEffectively (here) and LDBlog (here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are lots of reasons to reject Ms. Nagle&#8217;s analysis. This snippet shows only one: Learning Disability is not the result of a lack of motivation. If children with Learning Disabilities were not motivated, then all we would need would be some powerful reinforcers, as we have argued in earlier posts on TeachEffectively (here) and LDBlog (here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
